A Farmer in a Hunter's World: The Origins of Agriculture
Since ADHD is a collection of skills and predilections necessary for the success and survival of a good Hunter, we're left with the question, "What about non-ADHD people?"
When tillage begins, other arts follow.
The farmers therefore are the founders of human civilization.
—Daniel Webster (On Agriculture, January 13, 1840)
My wife, Louise, often jokes that she’s a Farmer in a Hunter’s world, since I and most of our children either have been or probably could have been diagnosed with ADHD. She’s the Farmer in a Hunter’s Family: the one who keeps us all on track, organized, and functional.
With every business we’ve started, I did the “outside” work of selling product, marketing, and generally getting people enthusiastic; Louise ran the “inside” of the business, managed our employees, and kept track of all the details (like she does now with our radio/TV show and our Substack newsletters, including this one).
Since ADHD is a collection of skills and predilections necessary for the success and survival of a good Hunter, we’re left with the question, “What about non-ADHD people?” Where did their skills evolve from, and why do they represent the majority of the people in our culture?
The answer lies with the second basic type of human culture which primitive humans produced: the agricultural society. In this sort of community, farmers were the ones who provided sustenance and survival. And the skills of a good Farmer are quite different from those of a good Hunter.
To go through a list parallel to those of a Hunter (see my last article), we find that a good Farmer:
— Isn’t easily distracted by his or her environment. It may take three or four weeks to plant all the seed or rice shoots necessary for a complete crop, and the window of good weather may be limited. If a Farmer were to get distracted while planting and wander off to investigate a noise in the forest, or spend days trying to figure out why one plant was slightly larger than another or satisfy some other curiosity, the crop wouldn’t get planted — and he or she would starve.
— Farmers sustain a slow-and-steady effort for hours every day, days every week, weeks every month. While it could be argued that there are bursts of energy needed during harvest time, most Hunters would say that such bursts are nothing compared to chasing a deer fifteen miles through a forest. And the Farmer’s “bursts” need to last all day, often for days or weeks at a time. Even in high gear, a Farmer’s efforts would be characterized as fast-and-steady.
— Farmers see the long-range picture, and stick to it. While subtle or limited experiments are useful for Farmers, to bet the entire crop on a new seed might lead to disaster. A Farmer isn’t just looking five minutes ahead, or an hour ahead (like a Hunter), but must, instead, look months or years ahead. How will this crop affect the soil? What impact will it have on erosion? Will it be enough to sustain the family or village through the winter? I’ve visited terraced hillsides supporting rice paddies or olive trees built by long-sighted farmers in Israel, Greece, Japan, and China that are still farmed more than 3,000 years after they were constructed: Farmers have the long view.
— Farmers are not easily bored. They pace themselves when living, the same way they pace themselves when farming. During the summer when things are growing, or during the winter when not much can be done, farmers find constructive tasks to occupy their time such as building furniture, chopping firewood, or weeding the garden. They don’t mind repetitive tasks or things that take a long time to accomplish (the way Hunters generally do) because that’s the nature of farming. Given Aesop’s model, a farmer would describe him or herself as the tortoise who ultimately wins the race through slow and steady effort.
— Farmers are team players, and often very sensitive to others’ needs and feelings. Because Farmers often must live and work together, particularly in primitive farming communities, they must cooperate. Japanese society is perhaps the most exaggerated example of this, evolving from an almost purely agricultural base. Their society favors thinking in terms of abstract notions and feelings, considering the future and the good of the community, and are patient chess players. Teamwork is a powerful asset of a Farmer.
— Farmers attend to the details. A Farmer must make sure all the wheat is threshed, all the cows are milked, all the fields are planted, or else he or she courts disaster for the entire community. If a cow isn’t milked completely it can become infected; a crop put into ground that’s too wet or too dry might rot or wither. Einstein’s “God is in the details” might be a favorite saying of a farmer.
— Farmers are generally more cautious than Hunters. Farming doesn’t often demand that a person face short-term danger; Farmers learn, instead, to face the more long-term dangers like famine. They’re often better planners than they are fighters.
— Farmers are often more patient with others than are Hunters. The patience that it takes to watch a plant grow for five months is easily translated into patience with a co-worker who wants to explain a problem or situation.
FARMERS AS NON-ADHD INDIVIDUALS
A quick review of the Farmer’s characteristics (obviously simplified for purposes of explanation), and a comparison of them with the Hunter’s skills, shows that one could easily recharacterize ADHD and non-ADHD persons as Hunters and Farmers. Although most people don’t fit into such neat categories, it’s still farily easy to see the archetypes demonstrated in people we all know.
Individuals who are almost pure Hunters are classified as classic ADHD. Individuals who are almost pure Farmers are classified as slow, careful, methodical, and, sometimes, boring. Since Farmer characteristics are less likely to be risky and dangerous (for reasons explained), these extremely non-ADHD people are not often classified by psychologists. They don’t generally get into trouble in school or at work, and tend not to stand out (for better or worse) in our society.
Accepting the idea that there’s probably a bell curve to these behaviors, though, we can posit a norm which incorporates both Hunter and Farmer behaviors, with swings in both directions on either side of the center line.
An interesting footnote to this hypothesis is the observation that Europeans often view Americans and Australians as “brash and risk-taking.” Americans and Australians often view Europeans as “stodgy and conservative.”
Accepting the notion that ADHD is an inherited trait, consider the types of people who would risk life and limb for a journey across the Atlantic in the seventeenth century — they’d have to be either desperate Farmers or normal Hunters.
Similarly, Australia’s early white population was often descended from prisoners sent there by England: the misfits and malcontents of British society. I suspect a very large percentage were ADHD Hunters who couldn’t succeed as the Industrial Revolution “Farmer-ized” the British labor market and culture ended up on those prison ships that took Englishmen to both Australia and our State of Georgia when both were penal colonies.
ADHD also appears to be a condition that’s relatively rare among Japanese whose ancestors have lived in a purely agricultural society for at least 6,000 years.
A final postscript: Some people have objected to the words Hunter and Farmer. Hunter, some say, has negative connotations: killer, predator, a threat in the night. Farmer is equally negative, in that it implies a boring, passive sort of person, and many Farmers (like Louise) are far from either.
If it makes you more comfortable, perhaps an alternate set of words would be Lookout and Cultivator. Both are necessary for the common good: where would the cultivator be without the lookout, and vice versa?
Worse, think what a disaster it would be to put either in the other’s job. The Cultivator doesn’t catch the little signs of the impending invasion, and the Lookout can’t pay attention long enough to weed the garden.
Yet that’s precisely what happens to most ADHD Lookouts in today’s classrooms and offices. If they look out the window (as their instincts demand), they’re scolded for not being good, attentive Farmers.
A more successful approach might be to recognize and speak to the skills inherent in the fast-moving Lookout/Hunter frame of mind. This may require a shift in viewpoint, but it’s not difficult once you see the difference between Hunters and Farmers and how, when, and where evolution has favored each.
I think that Thom's theory holds a lot of water and I consider myself to be a hunter although I have never been diagnosed with ADHD, but I can't stop thinking (hunting) for a more complete picture. My mind stubbornly returns to a period of time wherein a process may have occurred that bridges the gap between hunting/gathering and agriculture.
For a lack of a better word I use the descriptor, horticulture. I use horticulture to describe the process and time period that bridges the gap between hunting/gathering and agriculture. The "horticultural era" may have lasted many thousands of years and may also include the earliest efforts of domestication.
Those who gathered foods likely put considerable effort into the cultivation of favorites and inhibiting the growth of less desirable competing species. Many species of animals do the same although we don't really know if that process is conscious and deliberate or not.
Last night I watched a PBS program on grasslands that detailed how certain species affect ecosystems. Restoration of ecosystems required reintroduction of key species that created a chain of processes that facilitated biodiversity while inhibiting dominating species (often non-native) from over-consumption and eco-destruction. The tragic irony that modern science was only now beginning to comprehend what indigenous wisdom had long known was inescapable.
As a dog lover and a contemplative I have spent far too many hours imagining the process of early canine domestication. Wolves can be a competitive species for a hunter, but also a useful ally. Did we humans watch and learn from the wolves about effective hunting tactics? Did the wolves learn from us? How many generations were involved in the formation of cooperative strategies? Did we share (not always willingly) the bounty of our kills? Oh yes, many species share in the bounty of kills as those who love nature programs know.
Perhaps I'm going too far, but I've often said that it may be no mere coincidence that a wave of the hand and a wag of the tail are such similar gestures and convey such similar sentiment. I am not afraid and am happy to see you and be seen by you.