Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jon Thomas's avatar

Thom, I really appreciate this piece. The “warrior Hunter” frame gives language to a group of kids who are too often seen only through the lens of disruption, defiance, or severity.

Where I think this becomes especially useful is when we move from diagnosis to signal translation.

In the SignalWorks Life Alignment work I’m developing, I’ve been using a Hunter–Watcher–Mirror layer to describe how different nervous systems orient to the world. The Hunter scans for action, novelty, opportunity, threat, and urgency. The Watcher tracks pattern, timing, change, and risk. The Mirror picks up social and emotional meaning: tension, rejection, unfairness, belonging, shame, and relational threat.

Through that lens, the “warrior” child may be a high-intensity Hunter pattern, but the eruption often depends on what kind of signal lit the fuse. Was it blocked movement? A sudden change in the field? A perceived injustice? A relational wound? A loss of predictability? A child may look “explosive,” but underneath that explosion may be a signal arriving too fast, too loud, and without enough translation.

That’s why I love your reframe, and I’d add one caution: intensity is information, not permission. These kids do not need to be flattened, but they do need structure strong enough to hold their intensity without shaming it. They need adults who can stay regulated, rules of engagement that make sense, physical outlets that are real, and roles where courage, speed, loyalty, and protective energy can become assets rather than liabilities.

The JAMA study gives us a useful biological reminder that ADHD is not one thing. Your piece gives us a human reminder that some of what we call “severe” may also be unchanneled capacity. The next step, I think, is helping families, schools, and clinicians ask: What is this nervous system built to detect, and what kind of life structure would help that signal become useful instead of destructive?

No posts

Ready for more?